Applications and Proposals for Wind Farms
Content updated 2nd May 2019
Gilston Hill Wind Farm
Proposed 7 turbines up to 126.5m in height, sited on the northern slopes of Brotherstone Hill and on the edge of Fala Moor.
Application details can be found on the SBC Idox Planning Website at:
17/00226/FUL Land Northwest of Gilston Farm.
This application was considered by the SBC Planning Committee in October 2017, and was refused on Landscape and Visual impact grounds. The applicants Forsa Energy appealed against this decision. The appeal was considered by a Reporter appointed by the Scottish Government, and the progress of the appeal can be seen on the DPEA web site. The Appeal reference is PPA-140-2060.
The Appeal Decision Notice by the reporter was published on 7th Feburary 2019.
Having considered everything carefully, Heriot CC has decided to take legal action against the decision, with backing from concerned local people. That action has been lodged with the courts.
On May 30th, the procedural hearing was held about the competency of the HCC appeal of the Reporter's decision regarding the Gilston Hill Windfarm application. The decision was given to allow the appeal to proceed. The summary below was written for HCC to publish.
We hope to have a timetable for the appeal by the 7th of June.
Summary of hearing
Lord Malcolm, at a hearing today (30 May 2019) in the Inner House of the Court of Session, refused Forsa Energy Services Limited's objection to the competency of Heriot Community Council's appeal against the decision of Mr Croft, Reporter, dated 7 February 2019 to grant planning permission for Gilston Hill Windfarm. Lord Malcolm also ordered Forsa Energy Services Limited to pay the Community Council's expenses caused by the objection. In summary Lord Malcolm's opinion was that the community council were able to take the decision to appeal without it being debated at a public meeting, and that he had been provided with nothing which could support Forsa's submission that the community council had acted unlawfully or contrary to morality. Lord Malcolm also said that if the decision to appeal had been taken improperly, which he was not persuaded was the case, he would have been satisfied that the decision was in any event ratified at a meeting of the Community Council on 1 May 2019. As a result of this decision a hearing will be assigned in due course to consider the Community Council's grounds of appeal against Mr Croft's decision.
Summary of the grounds of appeal
That the Reporter:
- Failed to give adequate reasons for disagreeing with the first reporter’s conclusions.
- Failed to take account of the development plan, specifically the Supplementary Planning Guidance on Renewable Energy.
- Failed to take proper account of SBC's reasons for refusal.
- Failed to take account of landscape impact, or at least failed to give reasons for assessing no impact.
- Gave insufficient opportunity for interested parties to make representations about noise, which was one of the determining issues.
- Failed to take account of the developer's own recommended noise limits and imposed a noise condition that does not comply therewith.
Statement from Raeshaw
As an integral member of the local community, Raeshaw Estate is financially supporting the Community Council's appeal against the way in which the Gilston windfarm decision was reached.Download map showing layout for Gilston Hill Wind Farm.
There is a further proposed wind farm called Greystone Knowe. The developers, a firm called Coriolis, have not yet started the planning process. Initial indications are that there will be up to 12 turbines on land belonging to Pirntaton, Brockhouse and Haltree Farms. It is expected that initial planning procedures will start in 2018.
Wull Muir Wind Farm
The planning application for the Wull Muir Wind Farm was submitted to the Scottish Borders Council on 2nd April 2019.